After a lot of legal wrangling and back and forth, the U.S. Federal Court ruled against Toyota and ruled in favor of Paice LLC, a Virginia based firm that develops gasoline-hybrid and owns the patent on the microprocessor that handles the torque information exchange and runs motor via gasoline or electricity.
The court ruled that Toyota […]

In the recently decided case of Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, the California Court of Appeal may have dealt a death blow to the “narrow restraint” exception to California non-compete agreements, or noncompetition agreements.
In California, the general rule is that covenants not to compete are void under California Business and Professions Code Section 16600. However, […]