From PCT to US National Stage: How to get the initial filing right

Before filing a US national stage patent application

A PCT application provides several benefits beyond merely delaying the costs of filing individual national stage applications in desired countries. By taking advantage of these optional strategies while the PCT application is pending, an applicant can place their patent application in a more strategically effective position for entering the US national stage. Let’s discuss what can be done to optimize a PCT application for US national stage filing.

Amending PCT claims based on prior art search

One significant benefit is a prior art search conducted prior to the national stage deadline. By reviewing the prior art search results contained in the International Search Report (ISR), an applicant can strategically amend the PCT claims before the national stage deadline. In particular, the PCT claims may be amended to include additional features not shown or suggested in the PCT prior art search report.

Requesting a favorable PCT opinion on allowability of claims

The first PCT prior art search done by the International Search Authority (ISA) will show which claims meet the following three requirements of allowability:

  1. novelty;
  2. inventive step (PCT equivalent of nonobviousness); and
  3. industrial applicability (usefulness).

Since most claims will have some usefulness, PCT search reports will most likely find novelty or inventive step lacking in at least some of the claims in a typical PCT application. Filing an amendment and a Chapter II (“chapter two”) Demand will give the applicant a second chance at obtaining a favorable ruling indicating that the claims meet all three conditions.

If any claims meet all three conditions, the applicant may then consider filing a PPH request in a participating national stage country. Even if PPH is unavailable in a particular country, amending the claims prior to national stage entry will place the claims in a more allowable condition for examination. At least, the examiner in that country’s patent office may have to search harder for closer prior art.

Remove multiple dependencies and reduce claims to 3 independents and 20 total

The USPTO charges a hefty government fee for the mere presence of multiple dependent claims. If there is even one multiple dependent claim, a fee of $430 will apply to a small entity (double for a large entity). Furthermore, multiple dependent claims will add to the total number of claims which may then incur excess claim fees.

The USPTO charges excess claim fees for each independent claim above three, and for total number of claims in excess of 20. Paying such excess claim fees might not worthwhile given the high likelihood of an eventual Restriction Requirement in a case with a large number of claims. A Restriction Requirement will limit the number of claims that the examiner will review, thereby wasting the money paid for the excess claims.

Expect to disclose prior art throughout US national stage prosecution

The USPTO is unlike many foreign patent offices in that US patent laws require applicants to disclose known prior art that is material to the patentability of the claims. In other words, you have to disclose what you know is relevant in the prior art. This duty of disclosure will mean that you will have to submit at least one Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) citing the prior art uncovered in the PCT application.

If the PCT applicant has counterpart applications in other foreign countries, then any prior art uncovered by the foreign patent offices will also need to be disclosed if not already cited in the PCT application.

Though an IDS need not be filed concurrently with the initial filing, it can be efficient to do so. It would be a mistake, however, to have a “one and done” mentality where you assume that the first IDS is the only mandatory disclosure of prior art. To the contrary, you will need to file supplemental IDS submissions in a timely manner whenever new and relevant prior art has been made known to the applicant.

Need to file a US national stage application?

Contact US patent attorney Vic Lin at vlin@icaplaw.com to request a flat fee initial filing estimate for your US national phase application.

How useful was this post? (Did you find the information you needed?)

Click on a star to rate it!

Thank you for rating my post!

We want to do better.

Could you tell us what was missing in our post?

Frenda Williams
Frenda Williams
2023-02-21
I have had the pleasure of working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group on Trademark creation and contracts. As a solo and non-tech founder, the assistance, guidance and recommendations from Vic and his team have been INVALUABLE. And, with the knowledge that I have a Solid, well versed and caring legal team I can turn to, I have the confidence I need to navigate the intricacies of the tech industry as a solo founder. With that being said, If you’re a startup and you’re looking for a legal team that speaks your language, knows the industry and makes you feel like family…. Innovation Capital Law Group is a Perfect fit for you, your company and your team. Five out of Five Stars… don’t let their brilliance blind you 😁
Shiwei Liu
Shiwei Liu
2023-02-20
Excellent service and quick response. Lots of informative documents on its website.
Chang Chien Michael
Chang Chien Michael
2023-02-20
I have worked with iCap for more than 7 years. I am very glad with his professional knowledge that 7 utility patents were granted by USPTO. Vic and his team are very efficient and knowledgeable. Every time he can transcribe my design idea perfectly in two weeks and file it with no rejection from USPTO. The other service including the granted patent following up is always in time to remind me to take actions. That is why I still stick on iCap as my first priority when I want to file a US patent.
Mats Johansson
Mats Johansson
2023-02-20
We have been happy client for 10+ years. Awesome Patent Law Firm!
Hanson Chang
Hanson Chang
2023-02-16
Glad to write a review for Innovation Capital Law Group. We previously worked with a big law firm (2200 employees) on our patents, and decided to shift over to Innovation Capital. It was a great decision, this team got our patents done faster, more effectively, at a lower cost, and with broader claims. Win all around
Genevieve Springer
Genevieve Springer
2022-09-09
Clear, discernible tools and strategies couched within a business conceived from a genuine interest in doing right by founders.
InPlay Inc
InPlay Inc
2022-06-30
Vic and his team have been providing us with the best patent application experiences we could ever have in our entire career life! Their professionalism and technical knowledge have really saved us a lot of communication effort and time on the applications. Definitely highly recommend if anyone is looking for help with IP protection for their business.
Meg Crowley
Meg Crowley
2022-03-05
After working with Vic and his team at Innovation Capital Law Group, our organization is confident our trademarks were solid and protected. Thank you team.
Andy Dong
Andy Dong
2022-02-28
I have been using Innovation Capital Law Group for a few years and continue to use them. They have provided an excellent services on our legal issues including intellectual properties and patents . They are very responsive, easy to work with and very competent . I highly recommend them.

Follow us

Copyright © Vic Lin 2023